https://www.selleckchem.com/GSK-3.html
The overall number of wound-related complications in the barbed suture group was 3/30 (10%) versus 3/30 (10%) in the standard-of-care group (p = 1.0. There was one dehiscence 1/30 (3%) in the standard-of-care group versus zero in the barbed suture group (p = 1.0. The rate of superficial surgical site infection was 1/30 (3%) in barbed suture versus zero in the standard-of-care groups (p = 1.0. CONCLUSION These results suggest barbed suture utilization may be faster and more resource-efficient than the use of standard-of-care sutures for arthr
Like
Comment
Share
