https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/cfi-402257.ht
05) VT risk compared to epicardial pacing when pacing in proximity to scar (0.2cm). Endocardial pacing location does not significantly affect VT risk, but epicardial pacing at 0.2cm compared to 3.5cm from scar increases (P less then 0.05) it. Inverting the transmural APD gradient reverses this trend. Idealised models predict that propagation in the direction opposite to APD gradient decreases VT risk. CONCLUSION Endocardial pacing is less arrhythmogenic than epicardial pacing when pacing proximal to scar and is less susceptible to pa
Curtir
Comentario
Compartilhar
