https://www.selleckchem.com/ph....armacological_epigen
In discussing arguments which tend to dismiss risk, we identify the hidden premises needed to support these claims. Differences between a prudential model and a scientific model are considered. A 'reductio ad absurdum' objection, and fallacies of ambiguity, where 'insignificant risk' may be confused with 'inconsequential risk', are also discussed. Disagreement over the interpretation of risk has the potential to disrupt the optimum use of medical imaging technology. While communication of risk need not address the underlying
Curtir
Comentario
Compartilhar
