https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/3-3-cgamp.htm
9 versus 81.2, respectively; P= .0006); the University of California, Los Angeles score (31.1 versus 30.2; P .00001); the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (87.3 versus 84.5; P= .04); and the visual analog scale score (1.3 versus 1.6; P= .01). PRF resulted in an improved Constant score (80.1 versus 80.0, respectively; P= .04) compared with control. The current evidence shows that using PRP in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair can improve pain levels and functional outcome scores while reducing the retear rate after surger
Like
Comment
Share
