https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/beta-nicotina
99, p less then 0.01), and image noise (χ2, 21.20, p less then 0.01) due to marker presence. In 93% of cases, the median score of observers "agree" with the statement that marker-induced noise did not influence image interpretability. Marker presence did not interfere with confidence in diagnosis (χ2, 6.00, p = 0.2. CONCLUSION Inexpensive, easy producible skin markers can be used for accurate lesion marking in automated ultrasound examinations of the breast while image interpretability is preserved. Any ma
Me gusta
Comentario
Compartir
