https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/miransertib.h
3%, 95% CI 45.1-55.5) assessed the risk of publication bias in their primary outcome analysis. The primary outcome was statistically significant in 274 (79.6%, 95% CI 75.1-83.6) and had statistical heterogeneity in 167 (48.5%, 95% CI 43.3-53.8) reviews. The use and sources of external funding was not disclosed in 87 reviews (24.7%, 95% CI 20.5-29.5). Data analysis showed that the existence of publication bias was significantly associated with statistical heterogeneity of the primary outcome and that complex design, larger sample siz
إعجاب
علق
شارك
