https://www.selleckchem.com/products/pd173212.html
98), posterior soft-tissue repair (P = 0.5, and learning curve (P = 0.77). The acetabular implant was better positioned within the safe zone in the DAA group (relative risk = 1.17; 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.33; P = 0.01), but no significant differences were found in cup inclination (P = 0.8), anteversion (P = 0.1, and leg length discrepancy (P = 0.54). Dislocation rates after THA are not different between DAA and PA. Furthermore, no differences in the rate of dislocation were associated with cup positioning or surgical fact
Me gusta
Comentario
Compartir
