https://www.selleckchem.com/products/3po.html
732-0.775) for training set and 0.743 (95% CI 0.712-0.767) for validation set. Meanwhile, the calibration plots for 3- and 5-year OS displayed fine concordance between actual and predicted outcomes. In addition, higher areas under the curve (AUCs) were seen in training cohort (3-year 0.799 vs. 0.630; 5-year 0.797 vs. 0.648) and validation cohort (3-year 0.802 vs. 0.662; 5-year 0.752 vs. 0.66. Finally, DCA curves of the nomograms exhibited larger net benefits than AJCC stage. CSS nomogram showed similar results. Our study constructed and v
Aimer
Commentaire
Partagez
