https://www.selleckchem.com/Proteasome.html
476). For the secondary outcomes, the RAD group had more restoration replacements (P = .038) and more restorations performed since the beginning of the study (P = .038) compared with the VIS group. In addition, the RAD group had a higher number of false-positive results than the VIS group (P less then .001). Conclusions Simultaneous use of VIS and RAD for caries diagnosis in primary molars of children who seek dental treatment does not provide additional benefits compared with VIS alone. Practical implications Dentists should perform VIS only
Mi piace
Commento
Condividi
