https://www.selleckchem.com/products/rp-6685.html
005) and left ventricle (LV) mean dose (3.0 vs. 3.2, P less then 0.005) were all significantly lower with 3D-CRT technique compared to t-IMRT. Apical (8.5 vs. 9.0, P less then 0.005) and anterior LV walls (5.0 vs. 5.4 Gy, P less then 0.005) received the highest mean dose (Dmean). MWHD and LV-Dmean increased with increasing CTV size regardless of the technique. Low MWHD values ( less then 2.5 Gy) were achieved in 44 (73.3%) and 41 (68.3%) patients for 3D-CRT and t-IMRT techniques, correspondingly. Conclusions Our study confirms a conside
Curtir
Comentario
Compartilhar
