https://www.selleckchem.com/products/kt-474.html
05) except at the basal end and M levels were generally higher. CONCLUSIONS The HFms group had better median performance for monosyllables in quiet than the Helix group at each test interval, although performance in noise was similar. For speech in noise, the HFms group appear to reach optimum performance quicker than the Helix group. Impedances were lower in the HFms group across the array, other than at the most basal end, and support our hypothesis that the HFms assumes a more lateral position within the cochlea than the Helix electro
Aimer
Commentaire
Partagez
