https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/gkt137831.htm
001) and VM ears (p less then 0.001) than control ears. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated using a neurotology clinic MD prevalence of 7.9% in dizzy patients. A present cVEMP or oVEMP both have more than 93% chance of ruling MD out in the tested ear, while a cVEMP amplitude more than 54.9 μV or oVEMP amplitude more than 5.1 μV both have more than 94% of ruling out MD in the tested ear. CONCLUSIONS Despite some overlap in VEMP results between MD and VM, when
Curtir
Comentario
Compartilhar
