https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/bay-2402234.h
5, 25 underwent the IFT, and 14 underwent CP. Comparing the results of the closure rate, BCVA and recovery rates of the EZ and ELM between groups were similar to those in 48 eyes. Both the IFT and CP can achieve a high closure rate, with no significant difference in ordinary idiopathic MHs. The IFT does not seem to achieve better anatomical and functional outcomes than CP. The IFT should be used conservatively in ordinary non-refractory MH surgery. Both the IFT and CP can achieve a high closure rate, with no significant difference i
Curtir
Comentario
Compartilhar
