https://srcsignaling.com/ionic....-fluid-modification-
There were 354 changes included at a mean follow-up of five years (range, 0 to 13). The 5- and 7-year survival rates had been 87.9% and 86.9%, correspondingly. Dislocations (2.8%) and cup aseptic loosening (4.2%) had been the two most popular reasons for re-revision. No damage regarding the adapter system or the porcelain head took place. A femoral neck failed (0.3%). No implant features, offset (P= .088) or skirted (P= .87 tapers, impacted on failures
Beğen
Yorum Yap
Paylaş
