https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/oxidopamine-h
0.881, = .001). The ablation volume was also significantly higher with ICWT (11.55 vs. 9.45 cm3, = .003). The ablation zone on the zx plane was more circular with ICWT (0.907 vs. 0.883, = .028). The amount of energy applied was significantly bigger with ICWT (18508 vs. 16998 WS, = .003). Dual ICWT electrodes were better able to create more spherical and larger ablation zones than dual ICT electrodes. Dual ICWT electrodes were better able to create more spherical and larger ablation zones than dual ICT electrodes.Nanotec
Me gusta
Comentario
Compartir
