https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/xl413-bms-863
97; n=18) (ratio of HRs 0.80 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.97); p=0.03). Every study had an overall high risk of bias rating; this was primarily due to confounding. There was no clear evidence of an association between studies with food industry ties and the reporting of favourable results and conclusions compared with studies without industry ties. The statistically significant difference in the magnitude of effects identified in industry-sponsored studies compared with non-industry-sponsored studies, however, is important in quantifying
Aimer
Commentaire
Partagez
