https://www.selleckchem.com/products/4sc-202.html
Rehabilitation scoping reviews had an exponential yearly increase since 2008 (r2=0.89; p less then 0.01). The literature addressed diverse topics (e.g., spread over 43 condition groupings); 43% were published in Canada. Examples of methodological limitations included 39% of reviews did not cite the use of a methodological framework, 96% did not include the appropriate flow diagram, 8% did not report eligibility criteria, and 57% did not report data extraction details. CONCLUSIONS The increasing popularity of scoping reviews in rehabilit
Curtir
Comentario
Compartilhar
