https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/bgb-283-bgb28
All studies showed a low risk of bias in the "incomplete outcome data" domain. The need for plate removal (POR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.81, I = 0%) and dehiscence (POR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.63, I = not applied) was lower for the group of patients who used resorbable plates than for titanium plates. There was no difference in the occurrence of infection, diplopia, or paresthesia between the fixation methods. Resorbable plates showed better postoperative clinical performance. There was no difference in the occurrence of infection, d
Like
Comment
Share
