https://www.selleckchem.com/products/MK-1775.html
76E-05) while a further 2 had suggestive evidence (rs35337422 in RD3L, p = 7.21E-03 and rs12193446 in LAMA2, p = 2.57E-02). Accounting for non-additive effects had minimal impact on the accuracy of a polygenic risk score for refractive error (R2 = 6.04% vs. 6.01%). Our findings demonstrate that very few GWAS variants for refractive error show evidence of a departure from an additive mode of action and that accounting for non-additive risk variants offers little scope to improve the accuracy of polygenic risk scores for myopia.This work
Like
Comment
Share
