https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/defactinib.ht
The results showed no significant differences between the three conditions except for the knee' angle which was higher in the EX condition (167.3±11.6 vs 164.3±5.8 and 163.9±8) (p less then 0.005) than in the two other conditions (SS stimulation and CONT). This means that the EX stimulation induced a postural position change (i.e., a slight knee extension) during the monopedal postural task without altering balance control. Overall, on the basis of the stimulation parameters used in the present work, neither the SS stimulation, nor t
Gefällt mir
Kommentar
Teilen
